Manchester City, Newcastle, Premier League
Light sentence leaves Barton open to reoffend
Joey Barton has been handed a six-match suspension for his assault on Ousmane Dabo, but this weak sentence from the FA will incur the ridicule of Europe while adding further scorn on the national association.
Joey Barton was handed just a six-match suspension after seriously injuring a team-mate while at Man City
Comment
A six-game ban for seriously injuring a team-mate in a seemingly random act of violence is not only severely lenient from the FA but potentially negligent bearing in mind Joey Barton’s continual failure to better himself despite crisis after crisis.
The tale of Barton’s desperate life has new, negative chapters written at regular intervals - and this novel can surely only be described as a horror with a cataclysmic climax.
While such an extended ban is rare in England, Europe will be looking, through troubled and wondrous eyes, at the lax suspension handed to one of the Premier League’s worst trouble-makers and least amicable persons. For observations that the league has a thug element and holds little technical skill, read Barton and waist-high challenges that go unpunished.
The FA’s disciplinary system could easily find a place amongst the tools of the Ancien Régime. So backward that only once last season was a punishment for dismissal altered (which, by the way, was to bizarrely reduce Alan Smith’s suspension from three games to two despite being sent off for abusive language towards a referee’s assistant) and so pompous and underworked that they regularly add one match to a suspension for a ‘frivolous’ appeal rather than dealing with the real culprits.
In Spain or Italy, bans for diving are handed out retrospectively and extended suspensions are regularly proffered for abuse of referees and poor tackles. The FA system is so blundering that they couldn’t even meet a stern Fifa request to extend Martin Taylor’s three-game suspension for his leg-breaking challenge on Arsenal’s Eduardo. As Sepp Blatter and the world raged at the tackle, the FA’s response was typical of their desire to stand away from any possible conflict or controversy.
Rather than reviewing the Taylor case, they instead gave Jeremie Aliadiere a four-game suspension that same weekend, for touching the face of an opponent, with one extra game for the frivolity of appeal.
An FA promise to review their disciplinary measures at the end of the season was made, but little seems to have changed.
Fifa spokesman Andreas Herren best summed up the situation, talking in March, “There will be a meeting next month with the FA, but it will be an exchange of views on disciplinary matters in general. It will not be related to the Taylor case per se because that has now been dealt with. The FA have pointed out to us the considerations they took in determining his sanction and the case is not going to be pursued by Fifa. Both sides felt, however, that a general discussion would be beneficial and we hope the meeting can help us get a broader picture of the issues involved.”
In France, any violent conduct is dealt with severely, regularly resulting in double-digit suspensions for the perpetrators. When I told a high level referee friend in France that this would only ever mean a three-game suspension in England, his reaction was one of complete shock.
Barton’s suspension will again promote ridicule. A court heard earlier this year that 25-year-old repeatedly punched Dabo as he lay dazed on the ground and at one stage the Frenchman lost consciousness. The only relevant contemporary case to that of Barton’s is when Ben Thatcher, then of Manchester City, horrifically and deliberately elbowed Portsmouth’s Pedro Mendes, who fell unconscious. Then, the FA decided to be proactive after referee Dermot Gallacher only showed a yellow card, and charged Thatcher with serious foul play.
He was handed a suspension of eight matches, with a further fifteen suspended for two years. The FA commented that they “contend that the challenge was sufficiently serious that had Thatcher been sent off, an additional sanction would have been merited,” technically meaning the eight-game ban would have totalled 11 had the Welshman been sent off at the time.
Barton’s actions seem at least as, if not more, brutal than Thatcher’s yet the suspension belies this feeling. Thatcher’s attack was momentary and one fleeting moment of madness, while Barton continuously attacked Dabo as he lay on the ground. It is the equivalent of Thatcher, having elbowed Mendes, getting up and punching the Portuguese repeatedly while on the floor unable to defend himself, and that action, of course, would have resulted in a far longer suspension.
Before Barton’s case was heard, his camp appealed for leniency in the view that he and Newcastle United have endeavoured to get the player back on the right track and that a lengthy ban would not support this bid. But how many let-offs and extra opportunities can a repeat offender like Barton receive? It is not his first discrepancy and surely won’t be his last. Will the FA live to regret this ill-advised show of goodwill?
The commission’s statement that they “took into consideration the sanctions imposed by the courts and the pro-active support Mr Barton has received from Newcastle United and other professional bodies” and “wanted to punish the offence appropriately but give Mr Barton an opportunity to ensure his professional conduct does not falter again” are excellent excuses but they have again been too soft on an extremely disturbing and serious issue.
Whatever the sentence was, however, always bore little relevance on the mental state and future of Barton. Whether it was a six- or 12-match suspension would not have changed the former Manchester City player’s troubled state and it is now up to his club, all the relevant specialists and Barton himself to attempt to fix what has become an exhausting, prolonged and dangerous problem.
Tags: Arsenal, Ben Thatcher, Birmingham City, Eduardo Da Silva, Fifa, Jeremie Aliadiere, Joey Barton, Manchester City, Martin Taylor, Newcastle, Ousmane Dabo, Pedro Mendes, The FA
Related Articles
Discussion
4 comments for “Light sentence leaves Barton open to reoffend”
Post a comment
Welcome to Footballing World
Recent Posts
In Focus
Jonathon Craigie believes Rafa Benítez has finally found the key to securing Premier League glory for Liverpool.
Featured Posts
Fabio Capello's reign began slowly but England have since shone in World Cup qualifying, a return to the days of Sven-Goran Eriksson when progressing into major tournaments was always a facile task.
Jonathan O'Shea looks at the English quartet's chances of progressing into the knockout stages of the Uefa Cup.
How important is Javier Mascherano for Liverpool? Chakrit Narula believes the all-action Argentine could be a future captain following his terrific impact since arriving at Anfield.
Just how many more chances is this thug going to get…..one of these days he will seriously harm if not kill someone.
Whoever was sitting on this tribunal/panel it will be down to you if he re offends and he will….he should have been kicked out of football. You are pathetic and don’t have the balls you were born with.
Firstly, let me make it clear, I am in no means a fan of Barton, support his actions, or want him to play for any team I support.
However, in the real world there is a system whereby incidents are either dealt with in criminal courts, or in sporting courts. The two never overlap, and should never overlap. What the FA have done here is set a dangerous and previously unheard of precedent.
Barton was penalised in a criminal court and therefore should not have been banned from football. If someone’s prepared to pay his wages and pick him in the team, he should play.
This thug is never going to reform.
He’s just come out of prison, and his behaviour on the pitch in the recent game against Arsenal, coupled with his recently documented attitude to driving within the rules of the road clearly indicate that no matter how man “second chances” this person is given, he is just going to carry on as before.
His registration has to be cancelled.
He does not belong on a football pitch at all in any form or league, and if he still can’t behave as a civilised member of society doing a normal job outside of football, then he belongs behind bars permanently.
There’s been far too much sympathy for this thug, and the message this sends his victims is despicable.
If the authorities refuse to show some mettle and deal properly with this individual, what moral standpoint could they possibly have in the future if one of his victims decides that they are not satisfied with his sanction, and decides to exact some justice of their own?
This kind of lack of testicular fortitude is what leads to the breakdown of respect for the law, and the descent in chaos.
The authorities need to act firmly and promptly in cases like this.
Its a joke that Barton has been banned for it anyway! It happened 18 month ago and the FA have only just acted. Yes Newcastle knew he was likely to be in court when they bought him but for the FA to then ressurect something from so long ago is ridiculous!