Despite not making the final, Lionel Messi has been the success story of the Champions League. With effortless skill and astute vision, he has been a joy to watch. His much hyped battle with Cristiano Ronaldo turned how to be a no contest as, at just 20 years old, he was the attacking heartbeat of a Barcelona side with an apparent embarrassment of riches. With 72 matches under his belt and 30 goals, surely the sucess of Messi tells us something about the failings of an England team with few young prospects to turn to and a dim future ahead?

Look at all the big teams in Europe and you’ll see they each have their own batch of prodigies, all boasting to have the world’s hottest new prospect. In Spain, Messi’s catalan compatriot, the 18 year old Bojan has forced out Theirry Henry and put Ronaldinho in a strop. 19 year old Athletico Madrid forward Aguero has already played 71 games for his team bagging 22 goals. In Italy, one time Chelsea target Pato has scored an incredible eight goals in 15 for AC Milan. Meanwhile, 17 year old Inter striker Balotelli is setting Serie A alight with his performances. So to England’s teenage attacking talent: Theo Walcott still spends most of his time on the Arsenal bench whilst Chelsea’s Scott Sinclair has been sent on loan an astonishing four times in the last 12 months.

“It’s about time English clubs showed the next generation some pride”

So, are we really surprised England have failed to qualify for Euro 2008? If the situation remains the same, how can we expect to qualify for the 2010 World Cup? Or Euro 2012? Are we to rely on the same old heads? Bring Beckham out of a third retirement? We might as well get Gascoigne and Lineker back as well for what it’s worth.

In Europe, young players are shown off like trophies. Oppositions cannot deal with their speed and unpredictability. After all, how much homework can you do on a teenager? It’s about time English clubs showed the next generation some pride. And it’s not that England doesn’t have good young players, it’s that our clubs aren’t prepared to risk playing them. But why?

We have become a faithless footballing country.

The endless wells of cash have made it a safer bet to place faith in a hot prospect from outside Britain rather than play our own locally produced players. Our academies have become a novelty, an empty gesture. In fact, the Premiership has become a school for blooding football’s youngsters like Arsenal’s Cesc Fabregas and Manchester United’s Anderson. Sure, they’ve improved the league, but would they have been given the same chances at other clubs? Are we just doing a favour for our rivals by giving playing time to foreign youngsters rather than our own? By so frequently overlooking rising youth, does this mean our top clubs believe the country is ill-equipped to train new talent?

“Surely the proof of a good footballer, as in any profession, lies in performance under pressure?”

Last season, Glen Roeder had a revelation which sadly failed to linger as he drafted in youth players to an injury stricken squad. The young Canadian David Edgar and still-wet-behind-the-ears Steven Taylor featured against Bolton and performed exceptionally. Edgar named Man of the Match. Roeder was baffled. So with this epiphany, you’d expect it would leave a lasting impression, not just to Newcastle but the entire league. Well, Newcastle’s single hot prospect Andy Carroll has been sent on loan and the Premiership has chosen foreign imports over its own academy hopefuls. Surely the proof of a good footballer, as in any profession, lies in performance under pressure? Yet how can we expect to compete if we don’t give our players a chance? It seems Premier League clubs freely distance themselves from the responsibility of providing England with a future.

The Champions League has demonstrated the improvement of the Premier League but the success of English teams stand to leave damaging repercussions for the country’s future. Huge cash influxes from TV revenues threaten to usher more money to pass onto to the continent and fewer chances for young talent.

Should Chelsea win the Champions League, they’ll undoubtedly attempt to coax Messi to the Bridge, Scott Sinclair will be forced to look elsewhere. Man Utd are already eyeing Moutinho and a plethora of young foreign stars. For the sake of an all-star league, are we saying goodbye to competing in national competitions? We can all be proud of the resilience of Chelsea, the determination of Liverpool and the industry of Man Utd. But the glory of Champions League success can only be temporary. A façade for what can only exacerbate the challenge for up and coming prospects, and strangle the future of our national team.

Is it time for Premier League clubs to start taking risks on their young England hopefuls? Share your views in the comments section below.

Hiddink has never remained at the helm for more than five years anywhere, but from his first major managerial position at PSV it was predestined that the ex-De Graafschap midfielder would mature into a coaching maestro.

After spending time as an assistant manager at both his former playing club and PSV, it was in 1987 – at just 40 years old – that the club from Eindhoven, not yet amongst the giant Dutch clubs, began his global tour. And, just one year later, the European Cup was a rather large presence inside the trophy cabinet, dwarfing the three Eredivisie titles also acquired.

But it is with three different nations that Hiddink has created a legacy; one that has thrusted him unquestionably to the top of the world managerial rankings. His portly physique was employed fully when charged with controlling a typically belligerent Dutch squad and after a last-eight exit at Euro 1996, reaching the last four at the World Cup in France two years later was an immense achievement. After overcoming Yugoslavia and Argentina – with that eloquent and sublime Dennis Bergkamp goal - a penalty shoot-out defeat to Brazil was a cruel way for Hiddink to end his stint.

Just four years later, Hiddink’s Dutch success had been surpassed as he, against the odds, led co-hosts South Korea to a semi-final berth. The run included victories over Portugal, Italy and Spain before Germany halted their exceptional progress but not before a Guuseum was set up and the talent of the now 55-year-old had begun to be fully appreciated. Suddenly his services were hugely sought-after, but home was Hiddink’s favoured option and subsequently a return to the ‘Boeren’ (PSV).

And from nowhere, PSV returned to the fore of European football, nearly setting up a meeting with Liverpool in Champions League final of 2005 only to undeservedly lose out against Italian giants AC Milan. But, in his final year as coach of the now giants of Dutch football, he won the Eredivisie again to cap off an incredible eight years.

With less than a year to go until hosts Germany would kick-off the World Cup, he combined duties with club and country in agreeing to takeover another minnow: Australia. Perhaps he enjoyed the reduced pressure that comes with managing the likes of South Korea or Australia, but nonetheless he earned himself the ‘Houdini’ title once again as the Aussie’s qualified for the finals for the first time since 1974. It wasn’t as easy as beating the Solomon Islands.

For Uruguay, conquerors in the play-off of 2001, stood once again in Australia’s path. Hiddink’s first competitive match, having been coach for less than four months, would be in South America. There were few heroes in a 1-0 defeat except the improved defence, but four days later the nation would engulf football as it has never done before. In 1974 the national side had failed to score a goal and was made up of part-timers who struggled to get time off work but, as the squad of 2005 won 4-2 on penalties, euphoria and consequently optimism spread as quick as a forest fire, “Aussie Guus” seemed to have about every magical trick covered.

Despite Hiddink’s splendid record and a group containing Japan and Croatia as rivals for the second qualifying spot, faith in the ability of the Australian squad was not strong. Much was expected of Zico’s Japanese side as Asian football finally began to fulfil its potential; the Croats were the favourites for second spot; and Brazil, unsurprisingly, had only one plan: to pick up nine out of nine points.

The lack of belief seemed vindicated when Australia became overawed by the occasion in their opener against Japan. The loser of the game would almost certainly miss out on the opportunity to progress to the knockout stages, and so with less than ten minutes remaining the Aussie’s campaign appeared over, bar a miracle. Hiddink went all out for that sensation to occur – on came two forwards in John Aloisi and Josh Kennedy, and an attacking midfielder in Tim Cahill.

It was the Evertonian who saved face for his country once he netted Australia’s first ever World Cup goal after horrendous Japanese defending. But instead of settling for a point, the players acknowledged valuable momentum they had attained and seized the moment to secure their moment in Australian football history. Tim Cahill scored a wonderful 20-yard strike two minutes from time before John Aloisi surged forward on a counter attack and, absurdly, scored a third goal.

The deserved victory earned more accolades for Hiddink but the below par performance for the majority of the match against mundane opposition raised further questions over whether Australia could mix it with world’s best on the greatest stage. However all grains of doubt were eradicated in a battling defeat against Brazil when they acquitted themselves marvellously in their biggest competitive match.

The slice of luck that Australia in all probability required came as Japan courageously battled to a 0-0 draw with the main contenders for second spot, Croatia, who missed a first half penalty. So Australia needed a draw with Croatia to progress; if they lost Hiddink would record his worst World Cup performance. And draw they did. In a passion-driven performance, a 2-2 draw was hard-earned and the match warmed the hearts of football watchers across the globe. The game was riddled with controversy, but Harry Kewell kept his nerve to net with 12 minutes remaining and sent a nation that previously treated football with distance and aversion into ecstasy – not least Prime Minister John Howard, who along with all fans in Australia was up until the small hours.

And the growing band of supporters were up early again as Hiddink faced a rematch with Italy. South Korea had contentiously beaten them in 2002, and luck in 2006 was not favouring the Dutch coach or the Aussie team. Italian defender Marco Materazzi was sent-off early in the second half, but Hiddink was oddly restrained in contrast to what he had attempted in key group stage matches. He refused to send on attackers that could have taken the game to their opponents – instead the match lulled until an awful decision by Spanish referee Luis Medina Cantalejo. Fabio Grosso fell over, quite deliberately, the collapsed body of Lucas Neill and Francesco Totti scored with the final touch of the match. What goes around comes around; but that was no solace for the expectant fans across Australia, the players who had matched the eventual world champions, or indeed Hiddink who appeared disappointed not only for his team but for himself. He anticipated a quarter-final berth; instead it was a depressing end to a wonderful tournament.

Mark Viduka aptly summed up the narrow exit: “It is a sour way to finish. But everyone now knows we can match it with the big boys.”

Despite Hiddink not challenging his two previous World Cup endeavours, Australia’s performance was just as valiant and bold as Holland’s in 1998 and South Korea’s in 2002. It awoke a nation that had been void from international football for three decades, and Hiddink is the reason behind such a revolution.

Roman Abramovich will pay for his next contract, but Jose Mourinho’s job is not at risk. Instead, Hiddink takes the reigns of Russian football but despite the basic annual salary of $2.4 million, do not expect any less effort on his part. What’s more, the footballing world awaits a Russian revolution at the European Championships, 2008. It could turn out to be yet another miraculous chapter in his glorious novel.

But in the mix of these criticisms were entertaining and gripping matches that answered questions over why the World Cup is held in such regard.

Footballing World looks back on three more classic games from Germany 2006 in part two of our compilation.

ARGENTINA 2-1 MEXICO
Having shown their competitors how well they can perform, Argentina subsequently added another facet to their game by playing breathless and intriguing football. Welcome to the ‘new’ Brazil, said pundits. Ultimately the South American’s did not lift the Jules Rimet trophy yet were the most talented and exciting in Germany and intertwined the two qualities to overcome a much sturdier than anticipated Mexican side.

Ricardo Lavolpe – an Argentinean – stood in the tunnel while the anthems rang out, and shook off criticisms over his eccentric character and the many naturalised players in his squad to inspire his squad of players to produce Mexico’s best performance at a World Cup.

The game simmered before an early Mexican goal kindled a classic encounter. The Latin spirit was stirred up and it would last long into the night. With an attacking 3-5-2 formation on show, Mexico dominated regulation time in a tie expected to be one of the more one-sided of the second round. Argentina were withheld such was the desire of their South American compatriots, and from being footballing preachers against Serbia & Montenegro, Jose Pekerman’s troops relied on weathering the storm before belatedly disclosing why they were contenders for World Cup glory.

Rafael Marquez – so poor against Portugal, but by far the best player on either side in this match – drew away from Gabriel Heinze from a free-kick and finished with aplomb, on six minutes. The match, already threatening to be a brilliant occasion before the early opener, was made so and within the opening 600 seconds Pekerman saw his side level. Hernan Crespo was awarded the equaliser, although Mexican striker Jared Borgetti appeared to get the crucial touch as he attempted to clear. The pace and quality was maintained for an hour before inevitably a period of calm and cool.

With penalties looming, one moment of magic secured Maxi Rodriguez’s name in football history, Argentina’s in the last eight draw and the second round tie in the classic match’s category. Perhaps great games are only so because there is a defining moment; one effortlessly reminisced at – and Rodriguez provided it. Picking up a crossfield ball from Sorin, the midfielder chested the ball down and, without allowing the spherical object in front of him to bounce, let his left foot fly. An unstoppable effort to which there was no Mexican reply.

PORTUGAL 1-0 HOLLAND
From a match for the classicist to one for the scrapbook. This encounter is a casebook example of players playing the game in fraudulent style; there was no intent to please the observer’s eye. Ultimately the Portuguese progressed in a match undeserving of a winner. Even so this was a second round meeting to savour for purely entertainment purposes. The USA has never wholly engulfed football, but perhaps even this card-fest would have maintained their short attention span for an extended period.

Unless a supporter of either of the nations, the game was a scintillating one - due largely to the referee’s performance. The cautions, dismissals and scuffles that dominated the clash kept TV viewers shouting at their screens and, by the end, delirious while being restless for more. Valentin Ivanov ensured there were no breaks for adrenaline levels to subside: there were two yellow cards in the early minutes for the Dutch before Maniche scored the winning goal half-way through the first 45 minutes. But his expertly taken goal was a distant memory by the conclusion, and remains so in retrospect.

Costinha set the trend and tone for a chaotic second half by picking up his second yellow just before the break. Khalid Boulahrouz was more dubiously red-carded for seemingly elbowing Luis Figo before Deco restored the Dutch superiority when clearly and deliberately holding onto the ball to delay a free-kick. The image of the Brazilian-born midfielder twirling away from the grasp of an opponent best-suited a night of gross indiscipline and a free-for-all. Gio van Bronckhorst then needlessly became a record-breaking fourth player to see red in stoppage time; the second yellow card coming out despite Portugal’s Tiago running away from goal and the tackle being mistimed rather than malicious.

In the midst of the card fest, eight others saw yellow although somehow Figo escaped a dismissal for a headbutt which the official missed. There were various flashpoints throughout the second half, including when Deco flew in after Portugal felt they should have had the ball returned following a drop ball. That was his first caution; although for sheer intent he may have been shown a straight red card.

Ivanov stuck strictly to the rules of the game, and quite rightly it was the players who took the blame for an ugly and rowdy night. There didn’t appear to be a winner until the final scoreline flashed up onto the screen but despite the fact that ugliness dominated, a gripping match was on show – and perhaps for all the wrong reasons it goes down as a classic.

GERMANY 0-2 ITALY
Following those wins for Argentina and Portugal, the finals had taken a significant turn for the worse. The quality had deteriorated as a greater fear factor came into play. It appeared that after much early promise the tournament would quickly be forgotten. But, appreciatively, there was one more great match lying in wait. Germany’s performances and progress had awoken a nation that at first felt Jurgen Klinsmann’s men would flop at the earliest opportunity while Italy had risen from outsiders to become serious contenders in the face of domestic turmoil.

But fans’ parties and internal court cases were set to the side in an absorbing two hours that produced no goals until the death. A 0-0 semi-final may sound rather common but those who sat down were vastly entertained. The pace was reminiscent of Argentina’s victory over Mexico, but the quality was not as high and, crucially, goals were not forthcoming. Nonetheless chances fell regularly to both sides, with Italy always looking the more likely to infiltrate the German defence. Paradoxically, the extra time period was the more appealing and dramatic despite tired legs; though maybe also due to the fatigue that was setting in.

Alberto Gilardino hit the post before Gianluca Zambrotta smashed an effort against the bar. Germany, along with the woodwork, was rattled. Klinsmann sent on penalty expert Oliver Neuville near the end and Germany were rapidly looking favourites. The antithesis in the two nation’s penalty successes meant the German-dominated stadium was becoming increasingly buoyant.

But Italy, who must be praised for their exceptional attacking intent, stung the hosts.

Penalties avoid the need for banal matches to continue or be replayed but nevertheless cannot be described as a fit or just way to decided the outcome – especially on such a luminous semi-final night. And Fabio Grosso’s wonderfully taken effort followed by a classic counter strike (Alessandro Del Piero scoring an equally sublime goal) stunned the bulk of flag-waving and adoring fans.

It was an extraordinary night of pure football with an apposite ending, and brought the heart back into the finals following a lull. Ironically though, the blood stopped flowing into the hosts’ hearts which was the centre of the carnival and jaunty ambience.

1. Wags

2. Eriksson’s about to make a change

3. Our commentators are Mark Bright and…

4. Here’s Garth Crooks with the latest from Baden Baden

5. Nice trick from Cristiano Ronaldo… but he gives it away

6. What a waste there from Pauleta/Trézéguet/Ibrahimovic

7. Any references to (World Cup record goalscorer) Ronaldo’s waistline, ie “I Predict A Diet”

8. He’s gone down demanding the ball be put into touch

9. 1966

10. Wags

At his majestic best, between the previous two World Cups, Zinedine Zidane was a maverick artisan, his skill, vision and balletic ball control could make a football pitch look five miles wide. But at his petulant, loutish worst he brought the game into disrepute. But which will be our dominant memory of Zizou in years to come?

Given that Zidane seems to have ruled out coaching, and his unassuming personality off the pitch suggests a media career is not beckoning, his now exhausted playing days will surely provide the lasting memories of Zidane. His list of achievements is considerable; World Cup 1998, Euro 2000, Champions League 2002 and countless domestic winners medals grace his Madrid home. But it is easy to forget that the violent end to his career was not inconsistent with incidents which preceeded it.

Zidane was sent off fourteen times in his career. That’s thirteen more red cards than Robbie Savage. The first came in a punch-up with fellow youngster Marcel Desailly in the early nineties, but hindsight proves that cannot merely be written off as the folly of an inexperienced young man. It became clear during his time at Bordeaux that Zidane was a genius, and Juventus stumped up £3 million pounds for the French playmaker after Euro 96, in which he emerged to help France to a semi-final penalty shoot-out defeat to the Czech Republic.

Come the 1998 World Cup Zidane, now in his mid twenties and established as one of the world’s most promising talents, was the pivot around which France were expected to put up a serious challenge for the trophy for the first time since 1986. But the pressure caused Zidane’s lid to flip. In an unchallenging 4-0 romp over ten-man Saudi Arabia, Zidane stupidly stamped on Saudi captain Fuad Amin and was sent off. His suspension did not stop France beating, however unconvincingly, Denmark and Paraguay. In the quarter and semi finals it was others, most notably Fabien Barthez and Lilian Thuram, who became France’s catalysts.

But Zidane’s two goals in the final were confirmation that he was a player capable of delivering at the highest level. When it really mattered, Ronaldo faltered and Zidane shone. Two years later, Zidane’s performances at Euro 2000 confirmed him as one of the finest players Europe had ever produced; even, most agreed, surpassing Michel Platini as France’s finest ever player. At times the ball seemed to be tied to Zidane’s feet. He scored a fine free-kick in the electrifying quarter final win over Spain, and kept his cool to score the semi-final golden goal that beat Portugal from a controversial penalty.

Predictably, the tangible recognition of his talent flowed. European and World Player of the Year in 1998. World Player of the Year again in 2000, and for a third time in 2003. During these five years, Zidane scored one of the greatest goals in European Cup history volleying in from eighteen yards to win the 2002 Champions League final. His absence through injury in the 2002 World Cup contributed greatly to the French nadir that saw them crash out in the first round without scoring a goal.

Zidane’s career was on the wane in a way that mirrored the eroding, if not obliteration, of Real Madrid’s empire, at home and in Europe. By the end, Zidane’s cameo in the knockout stages in Germany was as unexpected as it was enthralling. In the preceding season, beset by injuries, he had been almost peripheral in Real Madrid’s unstoppable march to mediocrity. Second place in La Liga hides the real story of the 2005/06 season at the Bernabéu; humiliating inferiority to Barcelona, even greater political chaos at the club than normal, and a creaking team of ageing stars. Figo left, Raúl, Ronaldo, Zidane and Roberto Carlos were becoming near parodies.

It might be argued that the headbutt on Marco Materazzi was not just a response to an alleged racial slur, but an expression of exasperating frustration. Zidane’s performances against Spain and Brazil were the exception, rather than the norm. He could not inspire France to overcome Italy as the final creaked towards the penalty shoot out to which he was a mere spectator.

After 1998, his indiscretions continued, but were generally less severe, and took place in the comparative obscurity of domestic football, with one dismissal in the UEFA Champions League. When he headbutted Materazzi, those who had not been following his career studiously were astounded that such a great player could do something not just so contemptible, but so stupid. Those who did not follow football, but were simply watching because it was the World Cup final and so Midsomer Murders wasn’t on that week, will have the incident as their abiding memory of the player. It is those inbetween who will judge that Zidane has at times graced and disgraced the game with equal temerity. The latter does not taint the former, but the former does not exonerate the latter.

(Mike Martin is a freelance writer and sports journalist from Yorkshire. Contact him at mjefm@hotmail.com)

But in the mix of these criticisms were entertaining and gripping matches that answered questions over why the World Cup is held in such regard.

Footballing World looks back on three classic games from Germany 2006 in part one of our compilation.

PORTUGAL 2-1 MEXICO
There were no serious contenders for the ‘classic match’ status until the final round of group games – and then three came along at once, as they do. Portugal’s tie with Mexico was not designed to be an exciting end-to-end clash and was never billed as such, but ultimately the fact the South Americans were not guaranteed progress into the knockout stages set-up an exhilarating clash.

Maniche started a move which saw him run half the pitch to eventually finish it with a cool finish at the five minute mark. Then, to add to the building excitement, referee Lubos Michel did well to spot a Marquez handball and pointed to the spot much to the surprise of both sets of player and fans. Simao slotted home but the Mexicans, under the eccentricity of manager Ricardo La Volpe, began their belated entrance into the match.

Fonseca undid the Portuguese defence before 30 minutes had passed and the game opened up further to allow chance after chance to fall – and mainly to La Volpe’s men, who would have topped Group D if they had won. More drama was to follow as Mexico threw away the second penalty of the match; Omar Bravo blasting the ball into Austria before Luis Perez was sent-off for diving.

Having nothing expected of the game led to a thrilling action-packed clash. It personified the early stages of the World Cup which had been filled with rousing and exciting football.

IVORY COAST 3-2 SERBIA & MONTENEGRO
The Ivorian’s had impressed more than any other African side but lost their two opening games to the giants of Argentina and Holland and therefore were out, as were the Serbian’s who had not played well by any means, with the people of the country voting to split the two states just prior to the finals. Thankfully, performances can only get better despite the separation.

But with a third of the game gone it looked like it would be a happy goodbye: the European’s went two goals up against a hapless defence that appeared to know very little about the art. The Italian’s were, understandably, disappointed. Zigic and Illic sent the team into a relaxed and arrogant mood, but the Ivorian’s had a point to prove to the world. And with the help of Mexican referee Marco Rodriguez they managed to generate an impact and completed the best comeback of the entire finals. Classic matches may be a rarity but even more infrequent are typical lower league English matches where two or even three goal leads are never secure.

Perhaps the feral nature of the Ivory Coast side and slackness of the Serbians’ led to such an enthralling match-up. Dindane gave hope to the African nation just before half-time with the first of two penalties and their chances were given an added lift when Nadj was sent-off in added time for a second booking – after coming on as a substitute. Dindane’s header levelled the scores before another penalty was given away, once again for a ridiculous and silly handball (CF Croatia), and Kalou sent the travelling fans into raptures. There was more drama, however, as the Ivory Coast’s Domoraud was also sent-off, capping off the referees action-filled night.

The spirit of the World Cup had been encapsulated in both nations – in particular the Ivory Coast – in a match given little press coverage either side of the referee’s whistle. It was a see-saw encounter as good as one will ever witness at a World Cup finals and ultimately the neutral fan was rejoicing as the brave and excitable Ivorian team not only earned their first ever victory, but gained it in spectacular and brilliant style.

CROATIA 2-2 AUSTRALIA
Whereas the previous two ties had little or nothing riding on them bar pride, Croatia and Australia were pitting it out for a place in the second round. The Croats needed to win; therefore the Aussie’s job was to avoid defeat. In these kinds of clashes, one of two situations usually arise: either one side to freeze; or both retreat into their respective shells and wait for a mistake – the reference book will point to Switzerland v Ukraine in the second round as a prime example.

But it was the group stages and two minnows in Group F were vying for a shock place in the knockout stages. Roll on 90 minutes of blood, sweat and an outpouring of yellow colour.

Perhaps Srna’s third minute goal was critical to the open nature of the match. If Australia had netted the opener, the match would have been a tale of defending resolutely from then on. Instead Guus Hiddink ordered his team to attack and the Croats hit back with… well… more attacking football. Graham Poll, as you probably know, was the referee and should have awarded an early penalty to Australia when Mark Viduka was literally wrestled to the ground by Simunic (much more on him later). He then did spot a mad handball and Craig Moore equalised just before the interval.

So now it was Croatia’s turn to go gung-ho. And, aided by Zeljko Kalac’s dreadful error, they were back in the driving seat a little over 10 minutes into the second period. Nico Kovac is credited with the goal which was in fact a tame shot, straight at the goalkeeper, which somehow ended up rolling over Kalac’s stricken body. He had been thrown in for his first World Cup game as Mark Schwarzer ‘was not in the right state of mind’ and probably wished he was lapping up the sun somewhere else in Europe. Until Harry Kewell’s equaliser that is. Hang on – just before the Liverpool forward had netted a crucial second equaliser despite being offside – dear Mr Poll had missed an even more obvious handball in the area. It is difficult to comprehend how he actually overlooked the offence and the boys in gold were quick to appeal, but in vain.

Ultimately it didn’t matter with Kewell’s effort twelve minutes from time. At this stage my heart was thumping and the hospital were on standby. The football had been elating to such an extent that my adrenaline levels had been sent to new highs: it was the return of the good old attack & attack policy! It was mesmerising right from the start. But although the chances dried up in the last 10 minutes, the enjoyment and action did not. Dario Simic and Brett Emerton were sent-off within three minutes of each other before Simunic saw a second yellow card three minutes from the end yet stayed on the field – another error from Poll. Could the game take anymore twists? It already looked like an overused kitchen sponge squeezed of all remaining water and muck, but then a World Cup first occurred.

Graham Poll disallowed an Aussie third goal for pushing before calling an end to the match with his arms, too fatigued to blow his whistle another three times. Then, out of nowhere, a burst of reserve energy from the Premiership official. Simunic no longer cared and said something out of turn to the referee who promptly handed out his third yellow – and this time a red card did follow. It was goodbye to the Croats and Poll while Australia had achieved the necessary draw, but in perhaps the best game of the entire finals the focus was on what a sparkling event the evening had been. If the World Cup wants to be remembered in a positive light, then punters should look back to this clash as a real classic with all the essential ingredients to make it so. It is a game that will stick with me for many years.

World Cup 2006: The Review

After the mind-blowing number of upsets at the previous World Cup, the 2006 tournament - with the odd exception - saw football’s established names rule once more. And, though defences ruled and there were a lack of enthralling matches, there is still much to remember from the 2006 World Cup - good and bad.

Sad though it is, there can be no doubt what the defining image of the 2006 World Cup is: a brutish head-butt from the greatest player of this generation, provoked by taunting from Marco Materazzi.

History will also remember the most unsatisfying of conclusions to the World Cup; Italy’s penalty shoot-out win brought joy to a footballing nation awash with crisis, but, for non-Italian football addicts, the feeling was one of anticlimax. And, amidst all the controversy and debate over what provoked Zinedine Zidane and whether his reaction was at all justified, one burning question appears to have gone unasked: why on earth are penalty shoot-outs used to decide the World Cup winner?

They seem to have become accepted as the best way to find a winner to events, even if they will never be loved. Shoot-outs do test both skill and nerve, and are certainly the only feasible way to decide knockout games after extra-time. However, surely they should be more of a last resort when it comes to deciding the winners of the World Cup? Having a replay three days after the final would not satisfy sponsors and could lead to desperate ticket scrambles, but it would significantly reduce the chances of the tournament ending on such a disappointing note. If nothing else, it is worth discussing.

Fittingly, a defender, in the shape of Italian captain Fabio Cannavaro, lifted the World Cup. But what a defender! Cannavaro’s tackling ability, positional sense and sheer guts made him unquestionably the tournament’s best player. The side he led to glory were certainly not amongst the best to have ever won the tournament.

Lippi’s side were worthy winners; the character they showed in pulling together while four of Italy’s clubs were embroiled in a corruption scandal that affected 13 of their squad merited the biggest prize football has to offer

However, Italy were worthy winners; the character they showed in pulling together while four of Italy’s clubs were embroiled in a corruption scandal that affected 13 of their squad merited the biggest prize football has to offer. After starting the tournament with two strikers, master tactician Marcello Lippi did revert to playing with just one striker. Nonetheless, this Italian side, though they conceded just two goals all tournament, were not the archetypal defensive side we have come to expect, as was shown by their spirited and relentless assault on Germany’s goal in extra time of their enthralling semi-final. Eventually, Italy were rewarded with a brilliant goal from left-back Fabio Grosso in the 119th minute, and were even able to add another from Alessandro del Piero.

As well as Cannavaro and Grosso, Italy’s defence was brilliantly marshalled by indefatigable right-back Gianluca Zambrotta and Gianluigi Buffon. Luca Toni only scored two goals in the tournament but was a willing front-runner; however, it was Italy’s midfielder pairing of deep-lying creative genius Andrea Pirlo and all-action terrier Gennaro Gattuso that allowed the team to control games.

Fellow finalists France started awfully with draws against Switzerland and South Korea, but blossomed spectacularly to advance to the final. Their come-from-behind win over a Spanish side that had impressed so much sowed the necessary seeds of belief in the side. An intriguing game with Brazil was then won courtesy of a brilliant volley from Thierry Henry, but it was Man of the Match Zidane who made the difference.

After an ineffectual start to the competition, Zidane was suspended for the game with Togo, triggering the penning of many a premature obituary. But Zizou returned to inspire his side, aided by Henry, young livewire Franck Ribery and a rejuvenated Patrick Vieira. He kept his nerve to score the vital penalties against both Italy in the final and Portugal in the semi.

Under Phil Scolari, Portugal were much criticised for their play-acting, especially the otherwise excellent Cristiano Ronaldo, but they finished fourth despite the absence of a genuine goalscorer. Midfielder Maniche was probably their finest player, and struck two brilliant goals including the winner against Holland in the Second Round, a match which produced an incredible four red and 16 yellow cards. It was the second huge refereeing controversy of the tournament, following Graham Poll’s now infamous giving of three yellow cards to Croatia’s Josip Simunic.

The incident overshadowed what was probably one of the three games of the tournament. Australia equalised twice to draw 2-2 with Croatia in a dramatic match made all the more intriguing by the close relationship between the two nations, thus securing a place in the Second Round. Although they were knocked out by ten-man Italy through a last-minute Francesco Totti penalty, Australia’s exploits were vibrant and purposeful throughout; their terrific spirit was epitomised by Tim Cahill’s double against Japan, as Australia scored three times in the last six minutes to record their maiden World Cup finals victory.

Ronaldo responded to a nightmare start to score three goals, becoming the World Cup’s top ever scorer in the process. But, like many of the side beaten in the last eight, he is unlikely to return

While no team produced a shock comparable to the 2002 tournament, several less-fancied nations performed admirably. Ukraine got to the quarter-finals, but could not be said to have been amongst the best eight sides in the competition, as they were trounced by both Italy and Spain. Ghana beat Czech Republic and the USA with energetic and refreshingly adventurous play; the side led by inspirational captain Stephen Appiah did then lose 3-0 to Brazil, but the gulf in class was only apparent in front of goal. Ivory Coast were unlucky to be in Group C alongside Holland and Argentina; they were eliminated in the group stages but pushed both footballing superpowers very, very hard. And Angola’s goalkeeper Ricardo was sensational, helping them to draws with Iran and, much more impressively, Mexico.

Of the teams much was expected of before the tournament, Holland and Czech Republic both disappointed, particularly galling for the Czechs as their rampaging Tomas Rosicky-inspired 3-0 rout of the USA in their first game had many believing they could reach the semi-finals. The Dutch played in a physical and relatively unattractive manner, although Robin van Persie and Arjen Robben excelled on both flanks. England, playing predictable football lacking in creativity, scraped into the quarter-finals, where they were resilient with 10 men before being beaten on penalties once more.

Brazil were perhaps even more disappointing. That the pre-tournament favourites performed best when resting most their stars, against Japan, epitomises the side’s troubles. Manager Carlos Alberto Parreira’s excess faith in the 2002 winners, such as Cafu and Roberto Carlos, cost his country, though he was not helped by Ronaldinho’s inability to play with the same instinctive brilliance as when in a Barcelona shirt. Ronaldo, however, responded to a nightmare start to score three goals, becoming the World Cup’s top ever scorer in the process. But, like many of the side beaten by France, he is unlikely to return.

Argentina, meanwhile, impressed immediately in Germany, with a hard-fought win over Ivory Coast and then a spectacular 6-0 mauling of Serbia and Montenegro, who conceded just one goal in qualifying. The highlight of the latter game was Esteben Cambiasso’s goal following a back-heel from Hernan Crespo, the culmination of a spectacular 24-pass move.

Argentina met Mexico in the Second Round during one of the tournament’s finest games. Maxi Rodriguez’s brilliant goal in extra time secured victory over the side inspired by the inspirational play from Rafael Marquez, nominally a central defender. Having taken the lead against the hosts, Jose Pekerman’s negativity left Argentina facing a relentless barrage of attacks against Jurgen Klinsman’s side. Pekerman replaced Juan Roman Riquelme, whose creative genius was apparent all tournament, and also left Lionel Messi on the bench: the ultimate result was a Miroslav Klose equaliser and eventual defeat on penalties.

Jose Pekerman replaced Juan Roman Riquelme, whose creative genius was apparent all tournament, and also left Lionel Messi on the bench: the ultimate result was a Miroslav Klose equaliser and eventual defeat on penalties

As hosts, the Germans were superb. And the football side, so criticised in the build up to the tournament, played an open, expansive game which yielded 14 goals, more than any other side in the tournament; the tone for the style of play was set by the blistering strike from Philip Lahm, so impressive throughout, at the start of the 4-2 win over Costa Rica. Jurgen Klinsman, vilified in the press following a 4-1 defeat to Italy in a pre-tournament friendly, proved a sagacious and innovative coach. But, like Marcello Lippi, he has since resigned.

Despite the efforts of Germany, defensive excellence was the hallmark of the tournament. The average number of goals per game was a mere 2.30, the second lowest ever at the World Cup. The reasons for this are plentiful. 4-5-1 has become the tactic of choice almost worldwide; indeed, this was the formation utilised by both finalists. Holding midfielders are in vogue; there seem to be an unusually fine number of them in the game currently. A striker’s role, meanwhile, is now more focused on running the flanks and bringing other men into play; Hernan Crespo and golden shoe winner Miroslav Klose were the only poachers to really make an impact. Furthermore, this World Cup also highlighted the fact that there aren’t as many ‘international-class’ forwards as tends to be the case.

But the last reason for the lack of goals is certainly a positive change. The general quality of the weakest sides in the group stages has improved a great deal. Sides like Angola, Trinidad & Tobago and Togo proved genuine opposition, not merely sides teams looked to improve their goal difference against, as had been feared. While this is a cause for hope, the flip side is these countries only scored two goals in nine games between them. It would have been refreshing had they shown more attacking ambition and looked to beat teams, rather than simply draw with them. For instance, the Portugal-Angola game made extremely dour viewing. Portugal scored early, and although the Angolans were resilient and fiercely committed, they made little attempt to equalise, even in the last 10 minutes, seemingly content with a respectable defeat.

If such a thing exists, this was an ‘average World Cup.’ The lack of truly memorable games and outstanding attackers means it cannot be called anything more. But nonetheless, this tournament provided numerous great stories; it is these that make it a global tournament, not merely the clashes between traditional footballing powers. Even if the ending was irrevocably tarnished, history will remember this competition as an intriguing one.

West Germany’s victory in Switzerland at the 1954 World Cup against Hungary in the final – who they had lost 8-3 to in the group stages – was hugely unexpected. 52 years later, another nation on foreign soil would achieve a similarly surprising and phenomenal victory.

The Italian team, in the face of domestic turmoil that was directly affecting the future of 13 of the 23-man squad, bonded and united better than coach Marcello Lippi could have ever desired, and by living in seclusion at a base in the west German city of Duisburg, the focus was principally on the imminent campaign.

As prosecutor Stefano Palazzi urged Juventus, Lazio, Fiorentina and AC Milan to be relegated from Serie A for their suspected part in a match-fixing scandal, the players were gearing up for their semi-final tie with the hosts. But in the face of adversity came the seldom seen fighting spirit of Italian football. Just five days later, over half of Italy would watch Fabio Grosso’s penalty win the World Cup for the first time in 24 years.

Back in 1982, there was another match-fixing scandal engulfing Italy. In spite of this the nation grouped together and, after only progressing past the first group stage ahead of Cameroon on goals scored, they went on to win four games in succession, including a South American double over Argentina and Brazil and then the decisive victory over Germany.

It appeared that the latest scandal was indeed creeping into the camp and inadvertently into the players’ mind

Although the Italian squad of 2006 enjoyed a better start, the press hounds were released following a 1-1 draw with a clueless USA side which played with a man less for the entire second half. It wasn’t just the result bothering the media but it appeared that the latest scandal was indeed creeping into the camp and inadvertently into the players’ mind. They were presumably thinking along the lines of ‘will I be out of a club? When will I know? Where can I go next?’

Gianluca Vialli recently admitted that there has always been a suspicion of wrongdoing and corruption in Italian football but that the extent of it is was never clear. It was plain that Lippi’s men could be heading home early but concurrently a feeling emerged that if Italy could progress past the group stage there was a good chance that the players would be able to focus entirely on their next match rather than their next club.

For after the draw with the USA, there was no affection for the World Cup. In the eyes of many Italians, it was minor and unwanted distraction from the sleazy domestic game that was about to be purged. But by proceeding into the second round, interest swelled and both the fans and players no longer felt alienated.

And after an impressive defensive display for most of the second half against Australia, a late and disputable penalty was awarded and fittingly the troubled Francesco Totti stood-up and calmly scored. Then momentum and adrenaline took over. The thumping of Ukraine raised belief and expectancy levels, but it was the late show against Germany that finally convinced many that it was to be Italy’s year.

The Italian team had, once again, doggedly overcome domestic mayhem to win the World Cup. The party was unrelenting across Italy.

Rather than wholly relying on the defence to keep out Germany, Lippi urged his team to attack. It made for an exhilarating game and the two goals in the last two minutes of extra time arrived deservedly as the hosts played for a penalty shoot-out that they surely would have won. Overcoming 60,000 fans is demanding, but in the face of an uncertain future, it was especially gratifying.

Commentators pointed to a potential result in the trial the very day after the final, but the players appeared resolute in their focus and motivation. Their determination was sustained and as if to conquer the domestic demons, five out of five penalties were converted in the shoot-out. This came after having won none of their three previous World Cup shoot-outs.

The Italian team had, once again, doggedly overcome domestic mayhem to win the World Cup. The party was unrelenting across Italy. The last thing on the country’s mind was the domestic scandal. Instead, the actions of a small number of corrupt executives had been conquered by 23 tenacious football players, much to the delight of 58 million citizens.

Footballing World selects the star 11 players from a month in Germany.

Goalkeeper: Gianluigi Buffon (Italy)

No football experts need to be drafted in to describe the base of an Italian World Cup team: the defence. Before the final, only Christain Zaccardo had put past the globe’s most expensive goalkeeper and although the resilience of the four men in front undoubtedly helped his cause, Buffon quietly went about his business despite being implicated in the domestic scandal.

He has not had the chance to showcase and justify his price tag as of yet, but aided with the lack of much competition in the ‘keeper’s lounge, the Juventus stopper ensured that the only worry for Marcello Lippi and the Italian press was how goals were to be scored.

The only other occasion he was beaten was via a penalty in the final, but his regular two or three major stops in each of the seven games were of no difficulty to the ever-smiling and relaxed world-class goalkeeper.

Right-back: Gianluca Zambrotta (Italy)

Please note: a significant number of our select XI are Italian. But then again Zambrotta’s guile and propensity to perform brilliantly, results in a deserved place in the elite list.

He missed out on the first game but became an ever-present from the USA draw at right-back, despite his favoured position being on the opposing flank. And when moving forward, as the Ukrainians found out, Zambrotta can also cause havoc - he scored one from 25 yards and then expertly set-up another after barging his way past fellow defenders before sliding the ideal ball, while lying on the ground, to Luca Toni.

There was no better defence in the World Cup than the Italians’ - no real surprises there - but this time it was competent enough to allow Italy to progress further than what was expected, and Zambrotta was another of the unsung hero’s that went about his job with passion and vigour. But now his efforts can be recognised as courageous in the joyous scenes engulfing the country.

Centre-back: Fabio Cannavaro (Italy)

He may have missed out on the player of the tournament award by just 35 votes and his size may have been ridiculed but the Italian captain was the most adept centre-back of the World Cup.

Cannavaro possesses a mighty leap to get above even the tallest players, and gave away very few free-kicks and avoided even one booking. He did not become embroiled in arguments with the officials or the opposition like many nations felt the need to, but instead smiled and ran back into position.

No negative judgements could be passed on him like so many of the other stars of the World Cup and, like a good referee, the fact one didn’t notice his commanding presence was indicative of what a brilliant commander he was.

Centre-back: Roberto Ayala (Argentina)

The Argentineans, unfortunately, peaked far too soon and departed after reaching only the quarter-finals. The blend of youth with age appeared to be the right one for further progress, and this was personified by Ayala’s knowledgeable performances.

He has over 100 caps for his country, and helped them concede just three goals in their five games, as well as scoring himself against the hosts in the last-eight tie - a goal that looked for so long that it was to be the winning one. El Rat’n (the Mouse) has most likely played his final World Cup at 33, but his steady head kept Argentina bubbling and almost to the brink of glory and his passion will never dissolve.

Left-back: Fabio Grosso (Italy)

Unless you intensely follow Italian football, Grosso’s name will be new to you. He plays for Palermo and is 28, but the autobiography should be more interesting than that after his crucial semi-final intervention and then cool head in the final shoot-out. For a left-back, his curling effort on the turn that wrapped around Jens Lehmann, it was a moment of fame. The symbolic celebration followed and unexpectedly he was the face of Italy.

But his job was more complete than one vital goal. He missed only the draw with the USA, where one of the two goals Italy conceded in their seven games came, and not only did he frustrate opponent runners, he was given the freedom to scale the left flank and his ability was in full view in the first half of the final.

At one stage he used terrific skill to flick a ball past Willy Sagnol, and was a huge asset in the Italian’s impressive attacking force. He was one of the four imposing and inspiring members of the defensive line that proved so essential to the successful campaign. And to cap things off, he coolly slotted past Fabien Barthez to win the World Cup.

Midfield: Patrick Vieira (France)

Patrick Vieira was one of many Frenchmen who started poorly but improved as the tournment progressed. For those whose only taste of Vieira since he left Arsenal was his ill-fated return to the club with Juventus last season, his bad start proved the extent of his decline. But the former Arsenal skipper instead played some of the finest football of his career, to serve as a reminder that, in fact, he is only 30.

The tall, imposing figure of Vieira returned to the commanding figure of yore against Togo, on what was his birthday. With the first, crucial, goal, he secured France’s passage in the last 16. Thereafter, he proceeded to control proceedings against much finer teams. The presence of Claude Makelele alongside Vieira allowed the player freedom to utilise his power and raw pace to roam forward; the effect was devastating. Vieira scored another winner, against Spain, and suddenly he was less ghost-like; the often-passive nature of Vieira since 2004 was replaced with his more active and adventerous former self.

The Juventus player dominated games with his buccaneering style in Germany; he was a fusion of crunching tackles and offensive verve - Vieira contributed two goals and two assists in seven games, a remarkable tally for a player of his nature. Indeed, the winner of the Jules Rimet trophy could even had been different had perhaps the best player in the final during the first hour not been forced off through injury. While few dared themselves to question Wenger’s judgement in selling the man yet, Vieira’s superb performances at the World Cup led to a re-think of many premature obituaries for the player.

Midfield: Andrea Pirlo (Italy)

There can be no questioning of Pirlo’s impact on the world’s greatest stage, with the midfield dynamo scoring once, providing three assists, netting the first penalty in the final shoot-out and earning himself the Fifa Man of the Match award no less than three times, most notably in the final when his corner was met by Marco Materazzi’s head for the equaliser.

His ability was on show from the Italian’s first kick of the ball - his brilliant 25 yard effort in their first game against Ghana initiated what was to be a very successful campaign. And although Fabio Grosso’s 119th minute winning goal in the semi-final is the celebrated, it was Pirlo who provided the pass from the edge of the penalty area to Grosso’s feet. It had split the seemingly unbeatable German defence.

Pirlo came third in the Golden Ball voting, and was another Italian who did not dominate proceedings, but instead went about his job effectively and efficiently, and was a key element in his nation’s success.

Midfield: Gennaro Gattuso (Italy)

Every nation needs a dog-like performer to niggle at opponents and destroy their gameplan. Whether it is via disrupting passing moves or frightening defenders into submission, Gattuso lived-up to his status as the bulldog with virtuoso performances - he was the kind of player Brazil were too afraid to have and England missed out on.

His spell in Scotland with Rangers probably toughened him up in the Robbie Savage mode. Not only is Gattuso a tenacious midfielder, but understandably he is proficient as a defender, where he was forced to play for half the game against Australia. And judging by the minimal threat of Guus Hiddink’s men following Materazzi’s dismissal, he filled in superbly.

He earned a man of the match award against Ukraine and the shorts came off as is tradition after Italy’s ultimate triumph.

Midfield: Juan Roman Riquelme (Argentina)

The word ‘playmaker’ was invented for someone of Riquelme’s ability, and he was one of the few stars that lived-up to his pre-tournament billing. Given the iconic number 10 shirt, he lives an unusually quiet life and found Diego Maradona’s arrival in the team dressing room before the opening game against Ivory Coast disturbing and unsettling.

But it did not stop the Villarreal man potently breaking down the opposition. He has only flourished in the Yellow Submarine - away from the big town pressures of Barcelona - and his incredible ability was revealed when he cut through the Ivorian’s defence to send Javier Saviola through for Argentina’s second goal. He majestically patrolled the midfield and also set-up the first goal for Hernan Crespo: it was another lavish cross.

And although he did not score in the 6-0 beating of Serbia & Montenegro, Riquelme earned the Fifa Man of the Match award. He delivered the ball to Saviola who then flicked it on to Estan Cambiasso to finish that 24-pass move and was again the unassuming master of ceremonies. It was his corner that led to Argentina’s leveller against Mexico and Ayala’s header in the quarter-final. Riquelme was indisputably his country’s best player. He dictated how Argentina played without fuss, and then contributed immensely to all their attacking moves - many which ended with the prized result of a goal.

Midfield: Zinedine Zidane (France)

Zidane’s influence on the World Cup was such that he was voted Player of the tounament (although admittedly many of the votes were cast before his sending-off.) And it is easy to see why Zizou won the accolade - for his brilliant qualities lifted a France team that started feebly to a spectacular run to the final.

Even in a side featuring Thierry Henry, Zidane remained the talisman till the end. France were insipid in their opening two games, drawing against both Switzerland and South Korea; with Zizou nowhere near his best, the side looked bereft of creativity. Suspended for the crunch game against Togo - a match his country needed to win to progress - it seemed his last act on a football pitch could be being subbed by Reymond Domenech in the latter stages of the game with South Korea. Though ultimately his career did end ignominously, Zidane’s exploits between being subbed then and sent-off in the final confirmed beyond doubt that he has been the greatest player of his generation.

A sign of France’s downturn in fortunes was they were underdogs going into the game with Spain. The old guard were soon a goal down. But no matter. For Zidane helped thrillingly turn the game in France’s favour, orchestrating the play and delivering the two knockout blows; the first was an exquisitely-delivered free-kick headed in by Patrick Vieira; the second saw Zidane majestically seal the game with a devastating finish.

Against favourites Brazil, Zidane controlled the play effortlessly, spraying the ball around despite the attentions of several markers. Once more, it was he who changed the course of the game, finding Henry from a set-piece. But there was more to come from the 34-year-old. His reputation for coolness under pressure appeared to be confirmed by crucial penalties in both the semi-final and final. The stage seemed to be set for the greatest farewell in the history of the game; what happened next may have tarnished Zidane’s reputation, but his place in the pantheon of greats was long ago ensured.

Striker: Fernando Torres (Spain)

The latest Spanish prodigy has that essential hint of arrogance which was fit for the World Cup. And had the team not once again flattered to deceive, Torres may have well have ended up with the Golden Shoe. He plies his trade at lowly Atletico Madrid but on the evidence of his four games in Germany, he may find himself at one of Europe’s top clubs at the end of a large cheque.

Although he scored twice against Tunisia - including a penalty lucky to get past the goalkeeper - it was his opener against Ukraine that revealed his huge potential. Despite it being essentially a ‘team’ goal, Torres’s finish was opulent: he drove from just inside the box above the outstretched leg of a defender and past the despairing dive of Olexandr Shovkovskiy.

He may have become even better had Spain progressed beyond the second round, as they ought to have with their exciting and talented squad, but his time is the future.

OTHER CONTENDERS
Goalkeepers: Jens Lehmann (Germany), Ricardo (Angola)
Defenders: Lilian Thuram (France), Rafael Marquez (Mexico), Carles Puyol (Spain), Philip Lahm (Germany)
Midfielders: Luis Figo (Portugal), Franck Ribery (France), Maxi Rodriguez (Argentina), Maniche (Portugal), Cristiano Ronaldo (Portugal), Tim Cahill (Australia), Stephen Appiah (Ghana)
Strikers: Thierry Henry (France), Miroslav Klose (Germany)

Paul Robinson 6/10 Robinson came into this World Cup with high hopes he could take his outstanding Spurs form to the tournament; he ended it with serious question marks over his ability to handle crosses and even his big-match temperament. Though he improved in the knockout stages, Robinson certainly regressed in Germany; fortunately for him, however, there is an alarming lack of potential replacements.

Gary Neville 7 Only played in the first and last games, but was sorely missed in between. While he was gone, Jamie Carragher brought his defensive solidarity and Owen Hargreaves the attacking verve, but their performances paled in comparisons to those of Neville. The Man Utd skipper was handed David Beckham’s armband against Portugal, and relished the task of handling club-mate Cristiano Ronaldo; the only regret was a man with the temperament of Neville did not take a penalty.

Ashley Cole 8 Cole’s lack of game-time for Arsenal in the second-half of the season was a major worry for his country going into the World Cup. But there was no need to worry, for the Arsenal left-back’s fitness was terrific throughout - he played every minute of England’s campaign. He formed a penetrative partnership down the left with namesake Joe, but was also disciplined in keeping to his defensive duties. On several occasions, such as against Ecuador when he tipped a shot onto the post, Cole was invaluable in protecting Robinson’s goal.

Rio Ferdinand 8 Ferdinand was perceived to be the weak link in the central defensive partnership with John Terry, but he cut out his lapses in concentration and was terrific throughout; his pace often made up for Terry’s lack of it. If the 2002 World Cup was the making of Ferdinand, then this tournament brought confirmation of his status as one of the best central defenders in the world.

John Terry 7 Though his place was never in question and he was for the most part dependable, Terry certainly did not perform quite as he does for Chelsea. His lack of pace is well-known but, unlike when he is in a Chelsea shirt, he could not quite make up for it through his positional sense and lack of errors. That said, any criticism is relative.

Jamie Carragher 5 Carragher was required to stand-in for a couple of games for Gary Neville at right-back, and, though solid defensively as one would expect from a man who normally plays centre-back, he offered zero threat going forward, so was dropped for an even more makeshift right-back in Owen Hargeaves. And unfortunately for Carragher, the moment from him most people will remember is the penalty miss against Portugal.

Sol Campbell 5 One nervous cameo against Sweden, in which Campbell was partly at fault for the second equaliser, was all he had to show for a World Cup that never got going. His international career could well be at an end.

David Beckham 6 It all started so brightly, as Beckham’s free-kick created England’s first goal of the World Cup against Paraguay. But, thereafter, Beckham’s crossing and set-piece delivery became virtually the sole reason for his inclusion in the side, such was his lack of effectiveness on the right flank. Beckham did contribute heavily to half of England’s goals in Germany - including the free-kick against Ecuador which meant he had scored in three successive World Cups. Nonetheless, the skipper was rarely inspirational and Aaron Lennon impressed to the extent that many supporters were actually pleased when Beckham was injured against Portugal. He has since relinquished the armband, and other options on the right - either Lennon or Steven Gerrard - now appear England’s best route forward.

Aaron Lennon 7 Having made a late burst to secure a squad place over Shaun Wright-Philips, Aaron Lennon’s pace, ability to beat players - something Beckham has never done - and sheer joie de vivre made him into one of the tournament’s most effective subs. He transformed England’s lethargy against Trinidad & Tobago, and was very effective during his 70 minutes with Portugal. At times Lennon’s inexperience was apparent - especially in his final ball - but there appears little doubt the 19-year-old will become a star.

Frank Lampard 5 Fat Frank, as he became almost universally unknown, was seldom scared to shoot, though the results when he did were alarmingly poor for a man who scored 15 goals from midfield in the Premiership alone for Chelsea last year. Lampard did well in the first half against Sweden, when afforded cover in the shape of Owen Hargreaves, but, with it clear - as it has been for a long time - that Gerrard and Lampard need a holding midfielder alongside them and cannot play together in the centre, Lampard seems to have made a potential selection dilemma for Steve McLaren a lot easier.

Steven Gerrard 7 Though it was still hard to mistake Gerrard’s performances for those in a Liverpool shirt, the all-action midfielder fared relatively well in Germany, contributing two important goals, easily outshining Frank Lampard and always having an impact on proceedings. But one could reasonbly have hoped for even more from one of the world’s best midfielders; his best performance was actually his 20-minute substitute appearance against Sweden. It was also a shame that Gerrard was asked to play on the left of the midfield for almost an hour against Portugal, a position from which he will never be able to excel in.

Owen Hargreaves 8 For Nicky Butt in 2002, read Owen Hargreaves in 2006. The Bayern Munich midfielder entered the tournament being booed by his own fans. But Hargreaves’ strength of character was shown in the way he reponded to the critics. His tenacity, tackling ability, positional sense and especially his pace brought balance to England’s game against Sweden; he coped well as an auxillary right-back against Ecuador; against Portugal, Hargreaves was brilliant, even rampaging forward at times. His value to the side has now been confirmed beyond doubt - he even scored his penalty - and it must be hoped that a regular place is now found in the starting 11 for him.

Michael Carrick 5 Was viewed almost universally as preferable to Hargreaves in the holding role but, on the back of his performance against Ecuador, it is hard to see why. Is a very good passer of the ball, as we saw at times against Ecuador, but lacks his rival’s speed or harassing ability; if he is to be in the side, he requires a role that allows him to dictate the play more.

Joe Cole 8 Provided perhaps the side’s solitary moment of genius with his 35-yard wonder strike against Sweden. But Cole was consistently amongst the side’s best players, impressing hugely with his dribbling skills and running ability, although no one could call his play selfish. The Chelsea player has certainly now made the left-side position his own; yet, despite being England’s best midfielder during the tournament, Eriksson’s lack of trust in him was shown when Cole was sacrificed following Rooney’s red card against Portugal.

Stewart Downing 5 Utilised as a sub on three occasions, Downing was a peripheral figure, lacking anywhere near the impact Aaron Lennon enjoyed on the opposite flank.

Peter Crouch 6 Crouch was the only fully fit man in the strikeforce, and let no one down during his four appearances. Impressed with his holding up of the ball and work-rate, even if Crouch’s finishing was wayward, save for the face-saving winner against Trinidad & Tobago. The Liverpool forward did as well as could be reasonbly expected; nonetheless his performances confirmed the belief of many that his niche for England will be from the bench.

Michael Owen 5 Owen had his tournament cruelly cut with a 1st minute injury against Sweden but his exploits against Paraguay and Trinidad & Tobago were not those of a man full of either match fitness or confidence. The sharpness from his game was sadly lacking; he missed no clear cut chances, but there were occasions when one felt the Owen of 2001 would have scored. And Eriksson’s lack of faith was such that he was replaced before the hour in both the first two games.

Wayne Rooney 5 Completed a miraculous recovery, but for what exactly? Rooney’s talismanic value to the side was greater than his actual performances; only on occasions were the reasons Sir Alex Ferguson paid £30million for him apparent. Playing as a lone striker was never going to be Rooney’s forte, though Eriksson had a tough decision on how best to fit his star man into the side’s system; against Portugal Hargreaves was effectively starting over Crouch, and it is hard to argue with the decision in hindsight. But the Man Utd striker’s red card ended a tournament that longed for, but never witnessed, the best of Wayne Rooney.